The EU is pushing Russia into Asia—and it may live to regret it
The latest package may feel like pressure on Moscow, but it’s also an invitation for the country to redraw its future without Western Europe
There is a brutal kind of clarity that descends when diplomatic theatre gives way to economic warfare. With the unveiling of its 18th sanctions package against Russia, on Friday, the European Union has, once again, reached for the scalpel with a trembling hand and the swagger of a surgeon in a blackout. The measures are billed as decisive. They may prove defining. But not necessarily in the way Brussels imagines.
On paper, the centrepiece is clinical: the oil price cap on Russian exports has been sliced down to $47.60 per barrel. The goal is familiar—drain the Kremlin’s money chest, throttle its fiscal muscle, and force Moscow into economic submission. But in the world of energy, where ships move under flags of convenience and insurance is a negotiable fiction, enforcement is the real battlefield. Much of Russia’s oil flows not through visible pipelines but on tankers that operate in that murky limbo the West calls the “shadow fleet.” Which in reality is just a sinister-sounding way to label vessels which aren't registered in London.
Their names change, their owners vanish, and their cargos disappear into Asia. The EU may set prices, but the market often shrugs and sails on.
Then there is Nord Stream—once the aorta of Germany’s gas addiction, now destroyed. The EU’s full ban on all operations related to Nord Stream 1 and 2 is, technically speaking, the hammering of a coffin that was already shut. But its symbolism is stark. Not only is the tap closed, the very pipes have been written out of Europe’s energy future. Reopening them would now require not just a political miracle, but a legal resurrection.
And yet, one wonders: what is being closed off—and to whose cost?
For all the talk of isolation, Russia is not being boxed in. It is being rerouted. Pushed, perhaps unwillingly at first, into the arms of a waiting Asia. And with each sanction, each rupture, each EU press release, the pivot east gains velocity. Moscow may not be the courtier it once was, entertaining bids from Paris and Berlin. But it is not without suitors. China and India buy its oil and coal. Iran, Turkey, Brazil—all are eager to trade in a world where the euro and the dollar no longer write the rules in stone.
Today, over 80% of Russia’s seaborne crude oil exports are now headed to Asia—primarily China and India—up from less than 40% before 2022.
Some in the West seem to believe they are cutting off a gangrenous limb. In truth, they may be amputating their own influence. To Brussels, these sanctions serve a higher purpose: a line drawn in the sand, a signal of resolve in the face of aggression. They are framed not just as economic tools, but as moral imperatives. But even noble intentions can yield costly consequences.
Yes, the Russian budget will feel the strain. Discounts to Asian buyers have grown steeper, and the premiums once enjoyed from Western European contracts are now a relic. LNG projects face delays as sanctions block access to foreign technology and finance. The inclusion of a major Russian LNG firm in this latest package is no sideshow—it attempts to target the future of Russian gas, not just its present.
But Russia is adapting. And behind the noise, business is booming. The cost of evasion—in shipping, insurance, legal risk has gone up. So has the reward. The so-called shadow fleet thrives not in spite of sanctions, but because of them. As Western regulators tighten the screws, new channels emerge. These are harder to track, more expensive to disrupt.
None of this means Russia is invulnerable. Beijing will drive a hard bargain. Sanctions bite. Internal pressures are mounting, with high interest rates particularly burdensome. But the West has underestimated Russia’s capacity for reinvention before—and it may do so again.
Back home, the Kremlin will be forced into some trade-offs. Perhaps more borrowing. Maybe less largesse. At some point, the state may even have to choose between tanks and teachers. That’s not an outcome Brussels controls. It’s a wager.
Meanwhile, Belarus has been swept into the blast radius. A full EU ban on financial transactions now hangs over Minsk. The Belarusian economy will stutter. Industrial exporters will blink. And the bill, as ever, will arrive at Moscow’s door.
And yet, in the middle of all this, the Moscow Stock Exchange rose by 1% on Friday afternoon. A twitch of the market’s eyebrow, perhaps. Or a smirk.
The deeper question is what the EU loses in pushing Russia so emphatically into Asia.
It loses leverage. Once, energy interdependence gave Western Europe a stake in Russia’s future—and vice versa. It was messy, cynical, transactional. But it was influence. That rope has been cut. If relations ever thaw, these countries may find the taps don’t open so easily. The pipelines will point east. The contracts will be inked in yuan, not euros. The Russians may simply not come back.
It also loses relevance. In driving Russia into the arms of China and the Global South, the EU may be midwifing a geopolitical axis where it has no seat at the table. A new Eurasian framework—energy-rich, dollar-resistant, and diplomatically unbothered by Brussels—is being born in slow motion. Beijing and Delhi are retooling supply chains. BRICS+ is expanding. New trade corridors—land and sea—are being built that sideline the bloc altogether. The West cheers its own moral clarity while the world redrafts the map.
The most dangerous illusions are the ones we comfort ourselves with. That sanctions are a clean weapon. That pressure yields obedience. That isolation is always a punishment. In truth, the EU may wake to find it has unified its adversaries, empowered its competitors, and surrendered decades of economic entanglement in return for the fleeting pleasure of an embargo.
If Brussels wants to avoid becoming a bystander in the new order, it must pair deterrence with diplomacy—and remember that decoupling is a two-way street.
Sanctions are not surgical. They are not even blunt. They are chemical—they seep, alter, and react in ways that elude those who wield them. Western Europe may believe it is punishing a rogue state. What it may also be doing is exiling itself from the world it helped build.
And when the dust settles, it may find Russia still standing—just not facing west.
https://open.substack.com/pub/candeloro/p/brazils-silent-coup-gramsci-lula?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=zvhi
They have failed in domestic policies so spectacularly that they must look outside for something to blame. There is Russia, as ever, a convenient scapegoat.
The real question is will they dash themselves against the rocks of Russia kinetically once again? Either way they are in the middle of a suicidal fit of irrelevance. They have destroyed their own future by throwing away their energy security. They are in the process of a permanent political fracture as the masks of democracy and tolerance slip to reveal the same old facism beneath.
Perhaps it would be better for them to just suicide by Russian cop sooner, they seem to have their glory days after Russia smacks them down.